Blade Runner is a small story in a big world. When a sequel was announced I had this horrible sinking feeling that they were going to fuck it up on the scale of, say, most Terminator sequels. There are clearly flat backgrounds in normal scenes, big models like cars are all wobbly and don't give you proper feel. This isn't a problem on a second watch, because you can take it for what it is, but it's the reason many people need that second watch to enjoy Blade Runner. People complain about noticeable CGI. It's hard to say, no doubt that the film had a lot of perfectly shot scenes. The film is set in a dystopian future Los Angeles of 2019, in which synthetic humans … Blade runner 2049 was … Blade Runner is a 1982 science fiction film directed by Ridley Scott, and adapted by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples. Nowadays CGI makes things too busy with greebling and bustling nonsense, not to mention the orange/teal palate, although 2049 was able to use those very well. Personally I think it has a lot to do with how they are framed but I know there's even more to it than that... Blade runner in 4k looks better than most modern films Marvel movies. That being said, I'm looking forward to 2049 with a better director at the helm and better actors in Gosling and Leto. Well admittedly, Blade Runner is much better than most modern films. Ridley Scott was not a fan of the theatrical cut, which was put together by studio executives who wanted a happy ending to please moviegoers. ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. The Martian is my favorite sci-fi movie, so I'm clearly fine with Ridley Scott's work. The most interesting aspects of the world (such as most animals being extinct) are barely touched on. I love Harrison Ford in both Star Wars and Indiana Jones. But 2049 was awesome. Ok. If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. I really want to now. Roy never wanted to kill Deckard in the first place , he knew that his time would come and just want to show Deckard the pain that a replican had endured , he could essentially took Deckard 's gun when his hand stuck in the wall but he didn't and decided to only break his fingers. Blade Runner became a cult because of the original, not the Director's cut or The Final Cut, without it you wouldn't be asking this question. That’s because Blade Runner is a work of art and most modern films are rubbish. If that's how you see it then I don't know how to help you. overall probably the original blade runner gets the nod. I think that part of my problem is that I've been treating it like a normal movie and trying to follow the characters and the plot when I should be looking at the overall themes. I saw this in November on the most advanced IMAX digital projector in the world (at Cinesphere in Toronto). If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. I'd argue that modern films have less of this immersion breaking stuff. It's not about a grand struggle, or unraveling the mysteries of existence and being. Blade Runner is now considered by many to be one of the famed director's best works—fueling demand for the release of its belated sequel, Blade Runner 2049, in 2017. Their relationship is centered around both Deckard and Rachel's curiosity and attraction for one another. Your explanation is more convoluted than the film. On the other hand there is tons of things that puts you off as fake. No dream sequence. I also like it poses philosophical questions without being too heavy handed, which unfortunately has led a whole slew of people believing Deckard is a Replicant, but that is another topic. These days, Blade Runner is considered one of the all-time masterpieces of science fiction. Dune director Denis Villeneuve is eager to right the box office wrongs of Blade Runner 2049 with his upcoming adaptation of Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic.But to understand how Villeneuve got here in the first place, we have to go back to 2017 when he achieved the impossible by delivering a sequel to Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner that was arguably better … I might not be for you, and that's fine. However, when I did, I didn't enjoy or really appreciate it. Blade Runner has a special place in my heart, and is constantly flitting around in my top 5-10 films of all time. That's not something that is justified by nostalgia. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. This movie changed my life, it set my standards for anything sci-fi. Blade Runner is not a cult classic. Blade Runner: How Its Problems Made It a Better Movie You love Blade Runner because it's a hot mess. It wasn't the same but Joker really blew me away cinematography wise. The good cinematographers could make the '40's tech look good, and the bad ones are still making 2020 tech look terrible. Starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Sean Young, and Edward James Olmos, it is loosely based on Philip K. Dick's 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? My reply is only critical because we're comparing it to one of the best movies of the 20th century, when better movies in general were being made. Overall: Blade Runner. Blade Runner 2049 is a movie that is easily 15 to 20 minutes too long. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It's about trying to understand what makes us human and what makes us real. The main romantic relationship is centered around Deckard sexually assaulting Rachael. The setting is the most interesting part of Blade Runner and it isn't explored enough. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the bladerunner community. Originally released in 1982 and not a box office hit, director Ridley Scott's Blade Runner has not only achieved status as a seminal sci-fi classic, but the film has lived several cinematic lives in the last 35 years. It's definitely worth the price for the 4k copy!! I would disagree that Deckard survives because the plot demands it. Blade Runner 2049 is better by a country mile and it didn’t take multiple cuts to get that way. First up is the “original” or “theatrical” version — there are actually two of these, but the most commonly available one is the US theatrical cut, which is the version that people who bought a ticket to a US theater in 1982 would have seen. Blade Runner is a small story in a big world. It is just one of the themes of the movie. A subreddit dedicated to Blade Runner. Just light through glass. Blade runner is probably more influential, but some versions are worse than others. Most of city shots are undeniably seen as miniatures with small lights and you can't fool yourself no matter how hard you try. It could be my dislike for Ford as I only put up with him in Star Wars. Two times he survived because the replicants he was fighting moved away from him instead of killing him, another time he survived because of events that had nothing to do with him or the replicant he was fighting, and once the replicant he was fighting simply chose not to kill him despite trying to for the past several minutes. It's about trying to understand what makes us human and what makes us real. Check out Alien in 4K as well. Combined with a state of the art Dolby Atmos speaker setup, it was a mind blowing experience. Yes, but how lightsabers work isn't the focus of Star Wars and it isn't its most interesting part. Why? The 1982 dystopian science fiction action film directed by Ridley Scott and starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young. And really, now that CGI has gotten to the point where 80 percent of the time audiences don't even know CGI was used, (see: all the people who claim Nolan doesn't use CG) it's a perfectly viable technique to utilize in filmmaking, it just has to be used well. Aesthetically they’re both great. Pris gets him in a headlock he can't escape from, and the only reason he survives that is because she lets go of him and actually starts doing backflips across the room for no reason at all. So why does Bladerunner still look so good? Most of the actors seemed like they were underacting or overacting. That is what complaining about CGI are talking about. Don't force it. He literally closes the door, holds it shut to keep her from leaving his room, and forces her to kiss him (and presumably have sex with him). Sure, in real life it's pretty rape-y, but have a little nostalgic romanticism. I think you're focused on the wrong things. Still, he wasn't sure if the suspects were there anyway. I'm fine with the bleak outlook. The plot is structured around an idea that doesn't make any sense (It doesn't make sense that, after the replicants have already killed one blade runner, the response would be to just send another one with no backup and only a pistol to protect him. At the time all i thought was what a cool movie to watch in class, unaware the movie itself would forever always bring me back to such fond memories of that place and time. Maybe its the color saturation. First I need to explain why you should use paragraph breaks... New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. People who liked it weren't cool. A lot of things in sci-fi films are mentioned but not really explained, it's just part of world building. US THEATRICAL RELEASE (1982) It's ironic that the actual theatrical release of this film … In today's video (my first video ever), we look over both critically-acclaimed Blade Runner films to see which is better. I want to enjoy the sequel because I want to enjoy a critically acclaimed movie starring actors that I like that is directed by a great director. With the towering skyscrapers, entirely industrialized landscapes, and bursts of flame shooting into the sky, the original Blade Runner did a great … The scene at the beginning when they fly upto the tyrell building just when the first dude is taking the interview, the effects are astounding for the time! 2049 is better in every way, it’s not boring (OG is), and it tries to retcon the most problematic aspect of the first movie. He survives because a replicant (a THING that is created and looked at as an object to be owned) became "more human than human". This is so bizarre. Zhora coudn't kill him because the moment she almost did that , a girl went into the room so she didn't want to make herself a murderer in front of a human. He only is able to kill Zhora because she runs away instead of killing him when she has the chance. Because I fell in love with the original Blade Runner, with voice over. But that undercut Scott’s original in… First off I just want to say you don't have to enjoy it. I do like the premise but I watch it for technical aspects of the movie which are as good or better than most movies ever made up to an including today. You've got the cart before the horse here. I am just literally saying what happened in the movie. The neon lights looked incredible, but so did all of the outdoor scenes of spinners and street level shots. Much like Alien, I think there is a hypnotic rhythm to the film. This is a detective story, not an action movie. If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. There were 7 versions of Blade Runner in total that were shown to audiences*: 1. RELATED: Blade Runner 1982 vs. 2049: Which Sci-Fi Movie Is Better In Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner , the illegal landing of a group of six renegade replicants on Earth is what triggers the return of Deckard from retirement, as Captain Bryant asks him to ‘retire’ four of these replicants as his assignment. Honestly that's a half truth and misleading. Rachel doesn't know how to respond sexually because these are new feelings for her. It's one of the most popular 80s movies, and is considered one of the 50 best movies of all time by critics. 2049 was way better than it had any right to be and was good without needing to be re-edited. Amazing production design and great cinematography. That level of concept art and noire cinematography just aren't valued as much as big vfx these days. Blade Runner is an American neo-noir science fiction media franchise originating from the 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?